Lectures 3 & 4 - Critical Thinking

Back to cse1304 notes index | Next Page: Analysis

Copyright ©; Monash University, Semester 1 2005 CSE1304 Lecture 3 Slide 2 - Analysing information

Analysing information

Back to cse1304 notes index | Previous Page | Next Page: Primary Sources

Copyright ©; Monash University, Semester 1 2005 CSE1304 Lecture 3 Slide 3 - Primary Sources

Consider the source

  • Primary?
    • Direct from the origin
      • Scientist who conducted the research
      • Politician who made the statement
      • Judge who tried the case
      • Victim of the crime
    • Someone who not only was there but was directly involved
      • Not just a witness
      • A participant
  • Secondary?
    • Someone who talked to the primary source
    • Someone who read the primary source
    • Someone who was indirectly involved

And for both primary and secondary sources:

  • Is the statement complete?
  • Has it been taken out of context?
  • Have you been given the required background information to understand it?

Back to cse1304 notes index | Previous Page | Next Page: Evidence

Copyright ©; Monash University, Semester 1 2005 CSE1304 Lecture 3 Slide 4 - Evidence

What supporting evidence is offered?

  • Statistics?
    • Where did the statistics come from?
    • Can they be trusted?
    • Are relevant comparative statistics revealed?
      • 20% of smokers die of lung cancer
      • What percentage of non-smokers die of lung cancer?
      • "Universities receive more funding now than ever before" - David Kemp
      • Without comparative figures, statistics like these are inconclusive (but deceptively persuasive)
    • Correlation
      • Is the relationship cause and effect
      • Are there other relevant factors?
        • Parents who have multiple car accidents are likely to have children who also have multiple car accidents...so?
    • Surveys
      • Sample size
      • Derivation
      • Leading questions
        • "Product X is the greatest thing since sliced bread"
  • Appeal to authority
    • Who is the "authority"?
      • Is he or she an authority on this topic?
      • What are the authority's motives?
      • What is the authority's reputation?
      • Can the authority be trusted?
  • Isolated examples
    • "I have a friend who..."
    • "I know a case where..."
  • Graphs

Back to cse1304 notes index | Previous Page | Next Page: Graphs

Copyright ©; Monash University, Semester 1 2005 CSE1304 Lecture 3 Slide 3(a) - Graphs

Graphs - what questions should we ask?

  • Where is zero?
  • What's the scale?
  • What are the relative scales (for comparative graphs)
  • Is the change as large as it seems?
  • What is the rate of change?
  • How do the values depicted relate to the argument?
  • What other values would be relevant?

Example:

Back to cse1304 notes index | Previous Page | Next Page: Appeals to Emotion

Copyright ©; Monash University, Semester 1 2005 CSE1304 Lecture 4 Slide 1 - Emotional Manipulation

Emotional Manipulation

  • Appeals to emotion can be very effective
  • Especially:
    • Guilt
      • "If you really cared about the environment, you'd buy this product."
      • "If you were a real friend you'd come to this nightclub with me."
    • Greed
      • "If you invest in my company, you'll be rich."
      • "If you don't tell anyone we found this wallet, I'll split the contents with you."
    • Parental instincts
      • "Your children are at risk, buying product X will make them safe."
      • "If you do that, you will scar your child (emotionally) for life."
    • Status
      • "Everyone who's anyone will be there."
      • "This suit will make you look professional and impressive."
    • Fear
      • "If we encourage immigration, foreigners will take all our jobs."
      • "Who don't you want to buy this home security system? Don't you want to safeguard your family?"

Back to cse1304 notes index | Previous Page | Next Page: Personal attacks

Copyright ©; Monash University, Semester 1 2005 CSE1304 Lecture 4 Slide 2 - Personal Attacks

Personal Attacks
(also known as 'ad hominem' attacks)

  • Attack the speaker, not the content
    • Discredit the speaker
    • Make the speaker look bad
    • If the speaker is discredited, the speech is too.
    • Take the focus off facts that can't be denied
    • Put the focus onto people who are never perfect

Back to cse1304 notes index | Previous Page | Next Page: Red Herrings

Copyright ©; Monash University, Semester 1 2005 CSE1304 Lecture 4 Slide 3 - Red Herrings

Red Herrings

  • Undeniable facts
  • Valid statements
  • BUT not relevant to the topic
    • You want your children to be safe, don't you?
    • You want to be able to protect yourself, don't you?
    • You are concerned about the environment, aren't you?

Back to cse1304 notes index | Previous Page

Copyright ©; Monash University, Semester 1 2005
© All Rights Reserved