next up previous contents
Next: Optimal lattice constant Up: Derivation of the second-order Previous: Observed Fisher vs Expected

   
Multi-variate distributions

The message length expression can also be extended to multi-variate distributions. Assuming a symmetric coding region as in subsection [*], the coding region can be extended from an interval about $\theta$ to a hyper-cube in n-dimensions. An interval being a hyper-cube in 1-dimension.

There are some slight notational changes. The model $\theta$ is now a vector $\vec{\theta}$ in n-dimensions. The data x is now represented by $\vec{x}$. The spacing parameter $s(\vec{\theta})$ represents the volume of a hypercube. Finally, an additional approximation has been made. Each of the individual $\theta_i$ are assumed to be independent of each other. In general, this would not be true, although the original problem can always be mapped to a domain whereby the variables are independent.

The resulting message length expression is -


 \begin{displaymath}
\textrm{MesgLen~} = -\log_e \frac{h(\vec{\theta})f(\vec{x}\v...
...sqrt{F(\vec{\theta})}} + \frac{n}{2} (1 + \log_e \frac{1}{12})
\end{displaymath} (16)

$F(\vec{\theta})$ is the expected Fisher information in higher dimensions. This corresponds with the expression


\begin{displaymath}F(\vec{\theta}) = E_{\vec{x}} \Bigg[ \det \Big[ \frac{\partia...
...rtial \theta_j} -\log f(\vec{x}\vert\vec{\theta}) \Big] \Bigg]
\end{displaymath} (17)

Since each of the $\theta_i$ are independent, the matrix is a diagonal matrix, with non-diagonal entries being zero.


next up previous contents
Next: Optimal lattice constant Up: Derivation of the second-order Previous: Observed Fisher vs Expected
Edmund Lam
2000-12-04