(a) (b) (c)
1-20 21-40 41-60 a+b all
A 6 3 6 12 15
C 4 7 7 11 18
G 6 6 3 9 15
T 4 4 4 8 12
18! 15! 15! 12! 3! 7! 6! 4! 3! 3! 12! 11! 9! 8! 3!
------------------ v. -------------- . ----------------
63! 23! 43!
take neg logs:
null v. GC-rich "red"
----- -------------
201.0 (63) 121.5 (43)
- 36.4 (18) + 51.6 (23)
- 27.9 (15) - 20.0 (12)
- 27.9 (15) - 17.5 (11)
- 20.0 (12) - 12.8 (9)
- 1.8 (3) - 10.6 (8)
------ - 8.5 (7)
87.0 nits * - 6.6 (6)
- 3.2 (4)
- 1.8 (3)
- 1.8 (3)
- 1.8 (3)
-------
88.5 nits
Answer: the null wins by a small margin (odds about 4:1)
Please [check]!
(And note that if the supposed cut points (20+ & 40+) were not "common knowledge" but had to be stated in the hypothesis, that would add about 8 nits more to the "red" hypothesis.)